FeaturesWP CloudPricingEE CLIContactMy Account

Features

Team Access & User Permissions

Server Setup & Management

Site Creation & Management

Deployments & Developer Tools

Firewall Protection

Speed & Caching

Backups & Recovery

Logs & Monitoring

Create WP Cloud Sites

All Features

Read Documentation

Install

Installation Guide

FAQ

Roadmap

Explore EE CLI

Resources

Commands

Handbook

Blog

Community

Forum

EasyExperts

Tutorials

Subscribe

Github

CLEAR

Start For Free

separator Tutorials separator Nginx separator Tweaking fastcgi-buffers

Topics

On this page

Maximum Response Size

Average Response Size

Tweaking fastcgi-buffers

Following can help you tweak fastcgi_buffers size & numbers.

Maximum Response Size


			awk '($9 ~ /200/)' access.log  | awk '{print $10}' | sort -nr | head -n 1
		

Please note we taking HTTP 200 OK response only into consideration.

Average Response Size


			echo $(( `awk '($9 ~ /200/)' access.log | awk '{print $10}' | awk '{s+=$1} END {print s}'` / `awk '($9 ~ /200/)' access.log  | wc -l` ))
		

Based on above result, for rtCamp.com we found following values:


			Avg. 24807
Max. 629622
		

So we are using:


			fastcgi_buffers 32 32k;
fastcgi_buffer_size 32k;
		

Related: Nginx Log Parsing Examples

[emerg]: bind() to 0.0.0.0:80 failed (98: Address already in use)

PREVIOUS

Using $upstream_cache_status in access.log

NEXT


Comments

  1. ovidiu Avatar

    ovidiu

    July 26, 2013

    Ok so you’re setting the buffer to be slightly bigger than the average response size but I currently have the same settings show above here in the example and my values are avg. 5286 max. 635 so I could get a way with a buffer of 1kb but I doubt my current values are correct since phpfpm has been restarted recently….

    So if I keep my values for now, is a bugger that is too big bad or is it just a waste of resources?

  2. Dave Avatar

    Dave

    December 17, 2013

    Wouldn’t fastcgi_buffers 32 32k; give you a buffer size of 1m, much more than you need?

    1. Rahul Bansal Avatar

      Rahul Bansal

      December 18, 2013

      As far as I know, Nginx won’t allocate 1mb in one go. fastcgi_buffers 32 32k; will allocate buffers in pages of size 32k. First 32 will limit number of buffers/pages allowed to use in memory.

      We used 32k because average response size was around 24k as shown from calculation in article above.
      We limited max to 1mb because top most response was over 600k.

      Idea is to set default single buffer size for average response size so that multiple buffer allocation won’t be needed for average size. It is controlled using fastcgi_buffer_size.
      Then use fastcgi_buffers to provision additional buffers, in chunks, to hold max response in memory.

      If I missed anything, feel free to correct me.

  3. Moscato Avatar

    Moscato

    January 4, 2014

    Is there a major downside to using too many buffers or buffers that are too large?

    Are these buffers duplicated per connection? Process?

    I run a server with several wordpress installs, with 2 GB of ram with nginx and php-fpm with like over a gig of ram free

    1. Rahul Bansal Avatar

      Rahul Bansal

      January 7, 2014

      Answers:
      1. No. Tweaking buffers will not make noticeable difference to even sites with million daily hits (unless fastcgi output way larger than default size output)
      2. I think they are allocated per request.

Features

Useful Links

Product

Other Products

Subscribe for curated product updates, tips, and announcements.

"*" indicates required fields

Instagram

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Email*

SIGN ME UP

Δ


© rtCamp, since 2009. All rights reserved.

Powered by